Diaphanitas

"Laconica Fortuita"
"Random Laconics"

The major problems with Dawkins's Spectrum of Theistic Probability that I see are 1) it assumes that we have agreed that knowledge is applicable to theistic claims in the first place, 2) we have a real definition of "knowledge" in reference to theistic claims, and 3) we have a real definition of "theism" in reference to reality.

Consequently, depending on the definitions used, I can be, at the exact same time, a 1 ("God is my cat Tama, and I do not believe, I know") and a 7 ("God is a cat made of airport").